diff options
author | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> | 2022-01-02 21:35:58 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2022-01-25 22:30:28 +0100 |
commit | 61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017 (patch) | |
tree | 4f7922d52522639795e1716ac63a64c2e064b9de /kernel/locking | |
parent | e204193b138af347fbbbe026e68cb3385112f387 (diff) | |
download | lwn-61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017.tar.gz lwn-61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017.zip |
locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class
It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may
potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key()
is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This
is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key()
fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process.
After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed
but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to
it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep
is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if
KASAN is enabled.
To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always
search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and
zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/
Fixes: 8b39adbee805 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 89b3df51fd98..2e6892ec3756 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6287,7 +6287,13 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock) lockdep_reset_lock_reg(lock); } -/* Unregister a dynamically allocated key. */ +/* + * Unregister a dynamically allocated key. + * + * Unlike lockdep_register_key(), a search is always done to find a matching + * key irrespective of debug_locks to avoid potential invalid access to freed + * memory in lock_class entry. + */ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key) { struct hlist_head *hash_head = keyhashentry(key); @@ -6302,10 +6308,8 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key) return; raw_local_irq_save(flags); - if (!graph_lock()) - goto out_irq; + lockdep_lock(); - pf = get_pending_free(); hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(k, hash_head, hash_entry) { if (k == key) { hlist_del_rcu(&k->hash_entry); @@ -6313,11 +6317,13 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key) break; } } - WARN_ON_ONCE(!found); - __lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1); - call_rcu_zapped(pf); - graph_unlock(); -out_irq: + WARN_ON_ONCE(!found && debug_locks); + if (found) { + pf = get_pending_free(); + __lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1); + call_rcu_zapped(pf); + } + lockdep_unlock(); raw_local_irq_restore(flags); /* Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry. */ |