diff options
| author | Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> | 2016-11-10 13:06:39 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2017-01-14 21:36:06 -0800 |
| commit | f4dbba591945dc301c302672adefba9e2ec08dc5 (patch) | |
| tree | 1f806fb2dbfee1fdea1759440a75848776fcd8c8 /kernel/locking | |
| parent | b1c14a39adcf2237f31bcd0cd858bed5c54f2aee (diff) | |
| download | lwn-f4dbba591945dc301c302672adefba9e2ec08dc5.tar.gz lwn-f4dbba591945dc301c302672adefba9e2ec08dc5.zip | |
locktorture: Fix potential memory leak with rw lock test
When running locktorture module with the below commands with kmemleak enabled:
$ modprobe locktorture torture_type=rw_lock_irq
$ rmmod locktorture
The below kmemleak got caught:
root@10:~# echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
[ 323.197029] kmemleak: 2 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
root@10:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffffffc07592d500 (size 128):
comm "modprobe", pid 368, jiffies 4294924118 (age 205.824s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c3 7b 02 00 00 00 00 00 .........{......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d7 9b 02 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffff80081e5a88>] create_object+0x110/0x288
[<ffffff80086c6078>] kmemleak_alloc+0x58/0xa0
[<ffffff80081d5acc>] __kmalloc+0x234/0x318
[<ffffff80006fa130>] 0xffffff80006fa130
[<ffffff8008083ae4>] do_one_initcall+0x44/0x138
[<ffffff800817e28c>] do_init_module+0x68/0x1cc
[<ffffff800811c848>] load_module+0x1a68/0x22e0
[<ffffff800811d340>] SyS_finit_module+0xe0/0xf0
[<ffffff80080836f0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
unreferenced object 0xffffffc07592d480 (size 128):
comm "modprobe", pid 368, jiffies 4294924118 (age 205.824s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3b 6f 01 00 00 00 00 00 ........;o......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 23 6a 01 00 00 00 00 00 ........#j......
backtrace:
[<ffffff80081e5a88>] create_object+0x110/0x288
[<ffffff80086c6078>] kmemleak_alloc+0x58/0xa0
[<ffffff80081d5acc>] __kmalloc+0x234/0x318
[<ffffff80006fa22c>] 0xffffff80006fa22c
[<ffffff8008083ae4>] do_one_initcall+0x44/0x138
[<ffffff800817e28c>] do_init_module+0x68/0x1cc
[<ffffff800811c848>] load_module+0x1a68/0x22e0
[<ffffff800811d340>] SyS_finit_module+0xe0/0xf0
[<ffffff80080836f0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
It is because cxt.lwsa and cxt.lrsa don't get freed in module_exit, so free
them in lock_torture_cleanup() and free writer_tasks if reader_tasks is
failed at memory allocation.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c index f8c5af52a131..d3de04b12f8c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c @@ -780,6 +780,10 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void) else lock_torture_print_module_parms(cxt.cur_ops, "End of test: SUCCESS"); + + kfree(cxt.lwsa); + kfree(cxt.lrsa); + end: torture_cleanup_end(); } @@ -924,6 +928,8 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void) GFP_KERNEL); if (reader_tasks == NULL) { VERBOSE_TOROUT_ERRSTRING("reader_tasks: Out of memory"); + kfree(writer_tasks); + writer_tasks = NULL; firsterr = -ENOMEM; goto unwind; } |