summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolai Hähnle <Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com>2016-12-21 19:46:35 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2017-01-14 11:14:43 +0100
commit200b1874401555e9b36010aa318e75cf57005f36 (patch)
tree646203e67ab11ee6b22d52c439ae0e969f4b4a5f /kernel/locking
parent6baa5c60a97d7f1a37a4b5ab5fb3a450e56e8b06 (diff)
downloadlwn-200b1874401555e9b36010aa318e75cf57005f36.tar.gz
lwn-200b1874401555e9b36010aa318e75cf57005f36.zip
locking/ww_mutex: Notify waiters that have to back off while adding tasks to wait list
While adding our task as a waiter, detect if another task should back off because of us. With this patch, we establish the invariant that the wait list contains at most one (sleeping) waiter with ww_ctx->acquired > 0, and this waiter will be the first waiter with a context. Since only waiters with ww_ctx->acquired > 0 have to back off, this allows us to be much more economical with wakeups. Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle <Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1482346000-9927-8-git-send-email-nhaehnle@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/mutex.c40
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index d0f7628b5a3d..66967219477d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -596,23 +596,34 @@ void __sched ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ww_mutex_unlock);
static inline int __sched
-__ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+__ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = READ_ONCE(ww->ctx);
+ struct mutex_waiter *cur;
- if (!hold_ctx)
- return 0;
+ if (hold_ctx && __ww_ctx_stamp_after(ctx, hold_ctx))
+ goto deadlock;
- if (__ww_ctx_stamp_after(ctx, hold_ctx)) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ctx->contending_lock);
- ctx->contending_lock = ww;
-#endif
- return -EDEADLK;
+ /*
+ * If there is a waiter in front of us that has a context, then its
+ * stamp is earlier than ours and we must back off.
+ */
+ cur = waiter;
+ list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(cur, &lock->wait_list, list) {
+ if (cur->ww_ctx)
+ goto deadlock;
}
return 0;
+
+deadlock:
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ctx->contending_lock);
+ ctx->contending_lock = ww;
+#endif
+ return -EDEADLK;
}
static inline int __sched
@@ -655,6 +666,15 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
}
pos = &cur->list;
+
+ /*
+ * Wake up the waiter so that it gets a chance to back
+ * off.
+ */
+ if (cur->ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
+ debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, cur);
+ wake_up_process(cur->task);
+ }
}
list_add_tail(&waiter->list, pos);
@@ -746,7 +766,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
}
if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
- ret = __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(lock, ww_ctx);
+ ret = __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(lock, &waiter, ww_ctx);
if (ret)
goto err;
}