[PATCH] Convert cpu hotplug notifiers to use raw_notifier instead of blocking_notifier

The use of blocking notifier by _cpu_up and _cpu_down in cpu.c has two
problem.

1/ An interaction with the workqueue notifier causes lockdep to spit a
   warning.

2/ A notifier could conceivable be added or removed while _cpu_up or
   _cpu_down are in process.  As each notifier is called twice (prepare
   then commit/abort) this could be unhealthy.

To fix to we simply take cpu_add_remove_lock while adding or removing
notifiers to/from the list.

This makes the 'blocking' usage unnecessary as all accesses to cpu_chain
are now protected by cpu_add_remove_lock.  So change "blocking" to "raw" in
all relevant places.  This fixes 1.

Credit: Andrew Morton
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> (reporter)
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 32c96628463e..27dd3ee47099 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_add_remove_lock);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_bitmask_lock);
 
-static __cpuinitdata BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain);
+static __cpuinitdata RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain);
 
 /* If set, cpu_up and cpu_down will return -EBUSY and do nothing.
  * Should always be manipulated under cpu_add_remove_lock
@@ -68,7 +68,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug);
 /* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */
 int __cpuinit register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
-	return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	int ret;
+	mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
+	ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
@@ -77,7 +81,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
 
 void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
-	blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
+	raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
+	mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
 
@@ -126,7 +132,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (!cpu_online(cpu))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
+	err = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
 						(void *)(long)cpu);
 	if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) {
 		printk("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
@@ -146,7 +152,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	if (IS_ERR(p)) {
 		/* CPU didn't die: tell everyone.  Can't complain. */
-		if (blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED,
+		if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED,
 				(void *)(long)cpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
 			BUG();
 
@@ -169,7 +175,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
 	put_cpu();
 
 	/* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone.  Too late to complain. */
-	if (blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD,
+	if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD,
 			(void *)(long)cpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
 		BUG();
 
@@ -206,7 +212,7 @@ static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu);
+	ret = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu);
 	if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD) {
 		printk("%s: attempt to bring up CPU %u failed\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, cpu);
@@ -223,11 +229,11 @@ static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
 	BUG_ON(!cpu_online(cpu));
 
 	/* Now call notifier in preparation. */
-	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_ONLINE, hcpu);
+	raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_ONLINE, hcpu);
 
 out_notify:
 	if (ret != 0)
-		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
+		raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
 				CPU_UP_CANCELED, hcpu);
 
 	return ret;