summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>2020-11-21 01:55:09 +0000
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2020-11-24 20:29:26 -0800
commit59e2e27d227a0a4e7ec0e22c63ca36a5ad1ab438 (patch)
tree6ae4ae1dadba03d270b2214ea6aa25ee9e0b3d27 /kernel/bpf/verifier.c
parent607c543f939d8ca6fed7afe90b3a8d6f6684dd17 (diff)
downloadlwn-59e2e27d227a0a4e7ec0e22c63ca36a5ad1ab438.tar.gz
lwn-59e2e27d227a0a4e7ec0e22c63ca36a5ad1ab438.zip
bpf: Refactor check_cfg to use a structured loop.
The current implementation uses a number of gotos to implement a loop and different paths within the loop, which makes the code less readable than it would be with an explicit while-loop. This patch also replaces a chain of if/if-elses keyed on the same expression with a switch statement. No change in behaviour is intended. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201121015509.3594191-1-wedsonaf@google.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c179
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 84 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index fb2943ea715d..e333ce43f281 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -8047,6 +8047,11 @@ static void init_explored_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx)
env->insn_aux_data[idx].prune_point = true;
}
+enum {
+ DONE_EXPLORING = 0,
+ KEEP_EXPLORING = 1,
+};
+
/* t, w, e - match pseudo-code above:
* t - index of current instruction
* w - next instruction
@@ -8059,10 +8064,10 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
int *insn_state = env->cfg.insn_state;
if (e == FALLTHROUGH && insn_state[t] >= (DISCOVERED | FALLTHROUGH))
- return 0;
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
if (e == BRANCH && insn_state[t] >= (DISCOVERED | BRANCH))
- return 0;
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
if (w < 0 || w >= env->prog->len) {
verbose_linfo(env, t, "%d: ", t);
@@ -8081,10 +8086,10 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
if (env->cfg.cur_stack >= env->prog->len)
return -E2BIG;
insn_stack[env->cfg.cur_stack++] = w;
- return 1;
+ return KEEP_EXPLORING;
} else if ((insn_state[w] & 0xF0) == DISCOVERED) {
if (loop_ok && env->bpf_capable)
- return 0;
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
verbose_linfo(env, t, "%d: ", t);
verbose_linfo(env, w, "%d: ", w);
verbose(env, "back-edge from insn %d to %d\n", t, w);
@@ -8096,7 +8101,74 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
verbose(env, "insn state internal bug\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
- return 0;
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
+}
+
+/* Visits the instruction at index t and returns one of the following:
+ * < 0 - an error occurred
+ * DONE_EXPLORING - the instruction was fully explored
+ * KEEP_EXPLORING - there is still work to be done before it is fully explored
+ */
+static int visit_insn(int t, int insn_cnt, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* All non-branch instructions have a single fall-through edge. */
+ if (BPF_CLASS(insns[t].code) != BPF_JMP &&
+ BPF_CLASS(insns[t].code) != BPF_JMP32)
+ return push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, false);
+
+ switch (BPF_OP(insns[t].code)) {
+ case BPF_EXIT:
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
+
+ case BPF_CALL:
+ ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, false);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (t + 1 < insn_cnt)
+ init_explored_state(env, t + 1);
+ if (insns[t].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) {
+ init_explored_state(env, t);
+ ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].imm + 1, BRANCH,
+ env, false);
+ }
+ return ret;
+
+ case BPF_JA:
+ if (BPF_SRC(insns[t].code) != BPF_K)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* unconditional jump with single edge */
+ ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].off + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env,
+ true);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* unconditional jmp is not a good pruning point,
+ * but it's marked, since backtracking needs
+ * to record jmp history in is_state_visited().
+ */
+ init_explored_state(env, t + insns[t].off + 1);
+ /* tell verifier to check for equivalent states
+ * after every call and jump
+ */
+ if (t + 1 < insn_cnt)
+ init_explored_state(env, t + 1);
+
+ return ret;
+
+ default:
+ /* conditional jump with two edges */
+ init_explored_state(env, t);
+ ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, true);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return push_insn(t, t + insns[t].off + 1, BRANCH, env, true);
+ }
}
/* non-recursive depth-first-search to detect loops in BPF program
@@ -8104,11 +8176,10 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
*/
static int check_cfg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
- struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi;
int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
int *insn_stack, *insn_state;
int ret = 0;
- int i, t;
+ int i;
insn_state = env->cfg.insn_state = kvcalloc(insn_cnt, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!insn_state)
@@ -8124,92 +8195,32 @@ static int check_cfg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
insn_stack[0] = 0; /* 0 is the first instruction */
env->cfg.cur_stack = 1;
-peek_stack:
- if (env->cfg.cur_stack == 0)
- goto check_state;
- t = insn_stack[env->cfg.cur_stack - 1];
-
- if (BPF_CLASS(insns[t].code) == BPF_JMP ||
- BPF_CLASS(insns[t].code) == BPF_JMP32) {
- u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insns[t].code);
-
- if (opcode == BPF_EXIT) {
- goto mark_explored;
- } else if (opcode == BPF_CALL) {
- ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, false);
- if (ret == 1)
- goto peek_stack;
- else if (ret < 0)
- goto err_free;
- if (t + 1 < insn_cnt)
- init_explored_state(env, t + 1);
- if (insns[t].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) {
- init_explored_state(env, t);
- ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].imm + 1, BRANCH,
- env, false);
- if (ret == 1)
- goto peek_stack;
- else if (ret < 0)
- goto err_free;
- }
- } else if (opcode == BPF_JA) {
- if (BPF_SRC(insns[t].code) != BPF_K) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err_free;
- }
- /* unconditional jump with single edge */
- ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].off + 1,
- FALLTHROUGH, env, true);
- if (ret == 1)
- goto peek_stack;
- else if (ret < 0)
- goto err_free;
- /* unconditional jmp is not a good pruning point,
- * but it's marked, since backtracking needs
- * to record jmp history in is_state_visited().
- */
- init_explored_state(env, t + insns[t].off + 1);
- /* tell verifier to check for equivalent states
- * after every call and jump
- */
- if (t + 1 < insn_cnt)
- init_explored_state(env, t + 1);
- } else {
- /* conditional jump with two edges */
- init_explored_state(env, t);
- ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, true);
- if (ret == 1)
- goto peek_stack;
- else if (ret < 0)
- goto err_free;
+ while (env->cfg.cur_stack > 0) {
+ int t = insn_stack[env->cfg.cur_stack - 1];
- ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].off + 1, BRANCH, env, true);
- if (ret == 1)
- goto peek_stack;
- else if (ret < 0)
- goto err_free;
- }
- } else {
- /* all other non-branch instructions with single
- * fall-through edge
- */
- ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, false);
- if (ret == 1)
- goto peek_stack;
- else if (ret < 0)
+ ret = visit_insn(t, insn_cnt, env);
+ switch (ret) {
+ case DONE_EXPLORING:
+ insn_state[t] = EXPLORED;
+ env->cfg.cur_stack--;
+ break;
+ case KEEP_EXPLORING:
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ verbose(env, "visit_insn internal bug\n");
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ }
goto err_free;
+ }
}
-mark_explored:
- insn_state[t] = EXPLORED;
- if (env->cfg.cur_stack-- <= 0) {
+ if (env->cfg.cur_stack < 0) {
verbose(env, "pop stack internal bug\n");
ret = -EFAULT;
goto err_free;
}
- goto peek_stack;
-check_state:
for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) {
if (insn_state[i] != EXPLORED) {
verbose(env, "unreachable insn %d\n", i);