list_lru: add helpers to isolate items

Currently, the isolate callback passed to the list_lru_walk family of
functions is supposed to just delete an item from the list upon returning
LRU_REMOVED or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY, while nr_items counter is fixed by
__list_lru_walk_one after the callback returns.  Since the callback is
allowed to drop the lock after removing an item (it has to return
LRU_REMOVED_RETRY then), the nr_items can be less than the actual number
of elements on the list even if we check them under the lock.  This makes
it difficult to move items from one list_lru_one to another, which is
required for per-memcg list_lru reparenting - we can't just splice the
lists, we have to move entries one by one.

This patch therefore introduces helpers that must be used by callback
functions to isolate items instead of raw list_del/list_move.  These are
list_lru_isolate and list_lru_isolate_move.  They not only remove the
entry from the list, but also fix the nr_items counter, making sure
nr_items always reflects the actual number of elements on the list if
checked under the appropriate lock.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
index 4f4b1274e144..53cc2aaf8d2b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ struct xfs_qm_isolate {
 static enum lru_status
 xfs_qm_dquot_isolate(
 	struct list_head	*item,
+	struct list_lru_one	*lru,
 	spinlock_t		*lru_lock,
 	void			*arg)
 		__releases(lru_lock) __acquires(lru_lock)
@@ -450,7 +451,7 @@ xfs_qm_dquot_isolate(
 		XFS_STATS_INC(xs_qm_dqwants);
 
 		trace_xfs_dqreclaim_want(dqp);
-		list_del_init(&dqp->q_lru);
+		list_lru_isolate(lru, &dqp->q_lru);
 		XFS_STATS_DEC(xs_qm_dquot_unused);
 		return LRU_REMOVED;
 	}
@@ -494,7 +495,7 @@ xfs_qm_dquot_isolate(
 	xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
 
 	ASSERT(dqp->q_nrefs == 0);
-	list_move_tail(&dqp->q_lru, &isol->dispose);
+	list_lru_isolate_move(lru, &dqp->q_lru, &isol->dispose);
 	XFS_STATS_DEC(xs_qm_dquot_unused);
 	trace_xfs_dqreclaim_done(dqp);
 	XFS_STATS_INC(xs_qm_dqreclaims);