ext4: fix a potential assertion failure due to improperly dirtied buffer

On an old kernel version(4.19, ext3, data=journal, pagesize=64k),
an assertion failure will occasionally be triggered by the line below:
-----------
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
{
...
J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_dirty(bh));
/*
* The buffer on BJ_Forget list and not jbddirty means
...
}
-----------

The same condition may also be applied to the lattest kernel version.

When blocksize < pagesize and we truncate a file, there can be buffers in
the mapping tail page beyond i_size. These buffers will be filed to
transaction's BJ_Forget list by ext4_journalled_invalidatepage() during
truncation. When the transaction doing truncate starts committing, we can
grow the file again. This calls __block_write_begin() which allocates new
blocks under these buffers in the tail page we go through the branch:

                        if (buffer_new(bh)) {
                                clean_bdev_bh_alias(bh);
                                if (folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
                                        clear_buffer_new(bh);
                                        set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
                                        mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
                                        continue;
                                }
                                ...
                        }

Hence buffers on BJ_Forget list of the committing transaction get marked
dirty and this triggers the jbd2 assertion.

Teach ext4_block_write_begin() to properly handle files with data
journalling by avoiding dirtying them directly. Instead of
folio_zero_new_buffers() we use ext4_journalled_zero_new_buffers() which
takes care of handling journalling. We also don't need to mark new uptodate
buffers as dirty in ext4_block_write_begin(). That will be either done
either by block_commit_write() in case of success or by
folio_zero_new_buffers() in case of failure.

Reported-by: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240830053739.3588573-4-zhangshida@kylinos.cn
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
index b018a80fec7a..7ca4aca53162 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
@@ -601,10 +601,11 @@ retry:
 		goto out;
 
 	if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
-		ret = ext4_block_write_begin(folio, from, to,
+		ret = ext4_block_write_begin(handle, folio, from, to,
 					     ext4_get_block_unwritten);
 	} else
-		ret = ext4_block_write_begin(folio, from, to, ext4_get_block);
+		ret = ext4_block_write_begin(handle, folio, from, to,
+					     ext4_get_block);
 
 	if (!ret && ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
 		ret = ext4_walk_page_buffers(handle, inode,
@@ -856,7 +857,7 @@ static int ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent(struct address_space *mapping,
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = ext4_block_write_begin(folio, 0, inline_size,
+	ret = ext4_block_write_begin(NULL, folio, 0, inline_size,
 				     ext4_da_get_block_prep);
 	if (ret) {
 		up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->xattr_sem);