summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/buffer.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>2023-09-14 16:00:04 +0100
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2023-10-04 10:32:28 -0700
commit2a41815784e029cbef571511384f00fa40f2a82e (patch)
tree1b9f3cb0bd9973224854e98b4544b4ca259fd01f /fs/buffer.c
parent1b2b7a17ab60ed58875ba6a86ec79fad2f7b7d38 (diff)
downloadlwn-2a41815784e029cbef571511384f00fa40f2a82e.tar.gz
lwn-2a41815784e029cbef571511384f00fa40f2a82e.zip
buffer: pass GFP flags to folio_alloc_buffers()
Patch series "Add and use bdev_getblk()", v2. This patch series fixes a bug reported by Hui Zhu; see proposed patches v1 and v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230811035705.3296-1-teawaterz@linux.alibaba.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230811071519.1094-1-teawaterz@linux.alibaba.com/ I decided to go in a rather different direction for this fix, and fix a related problem at the same time. I don't think there's any urgency to rush this into Linus' tree, nor have I marked it for stable. Reasonable people may disagree. This patch (of 8): Instead of creating entirely new flags, inherit them from grow_dev_page(). The other callers create the same flags that this function used to create. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230914150011.843330-1-willy@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230914150011.843330-2-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@antgroup.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/buffer.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/buffer.c17
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 12e9a71c693d..32338b7cfeb9 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -915,16 +915,12 @@ int remove_inode_buffers(struct inode *inode)
* which may not fail from ordinary buffer allocations.
*/
struct buffer_head *folio_alloc_buffers(struct folio *folio, unsigned long size,
- bool retry)
+ gfp_t gfp)
{
struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
- gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
long offset;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg, *old_memcg;
- if (retry)
- gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
-
/* The folio lock pins the memcg */
memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
old_memcg = set_active_memcg(memcg);
@@ -967,7 +963,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(folio_alloc_buffers);
struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned long size,
bool retry)
{
- return folio_alloc_buffers(page_folio(page), size, retry);
+ gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
+ if (retry)
+ gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
+
+ return folio_alloc_buffers(page_folio(page), size, gfp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(alloc_page_buffers);
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
goto failed;
}
- bh = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, size, true);
+ bh = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, size, gfp_mask | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
/*
* Link the folio to the buffers and initialise them. Take the
@@ -1644,8 +1644,9 @@ void folio_create_empty_buffers(struct folio *folio, unsigned long blocksize,
unsigned long b_state)
{
struct buffer_head *bh, *head, *tail;
+ gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOFAIL;
- head = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, blocksize, true);
+ head = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, blocksize, gfp);
bh = head;
do {
bh->b_state |= b_state;