summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Mason <clm@fb.com>2017-06-23 09:48:21 -0700
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2017-06-29 20:17:02 +0200
commit6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e (patch)
treef4a5c584983c110e0b2ddc9e3b51c25e11801353 /fs/btrfs/scrub.c
parentded56184a562b925a588b6e78688e2e60757b425 (diff)
downloadlwn-6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e.tar.gz
lwn-6374e57ad8091b9c2db2eecc536c7f0166ce099e.zip
btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr
Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with v4.12-rc6. This was because commit 70e7af244 made it possible for calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number. It's not really a bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find all the possible 64->32 bit overflows. This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone that uses the results of that math to u64 as well. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Fixes: 70e7af2 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow") Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/scrub.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/scrub.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 738e784ba20d..0cebeb5eb5d0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -3836,7 +3836,7 @@ int scrub_enumerate_chunks(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
*/
btrfs_wait_block_group_reservations(cache);
btrfs_wait_nocow_writers(cache);
- ret = btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(fs_info, -1,
+ ret = btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(fs_info, U64_MAX,
cache->key.objectid,
cache->key.offset);
if (ret > 0) {