summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/scsi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>2009-07-28 17:33:37 -0700
committerJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>2009-07-30 08:50:02 -0500
commita0cc1ecc098e31d03b3265712a3e280a7fabf438 (patch)
treec35828c5b9c9c7beb4f52dbe4163d9a087d60a0a /drivers/scsi
parent16ed55f9de6743ceece9bf528362cadff10f1c5c (diff)
downloadlwn-a0cc1ecc098e31d03b3265712a3e280a7fabf438.tar.gz
lwn-a0cc1ecc098e31d03b3265712a3e280a7fabf438.zip
[SCSI] libfc: fix a circular locking warning during sending RRQ
Currently the fc_exch_rrq is called with fc_exch's ex_lock held. The fc_exch_rrq allocates new exch and that requires taking ex_lock again after EM lock. This locking order causes warning, see more details on this warning at :- http://www.open-fcoe.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/003251.html This patch fixes this by dropping the ex_lock before calling fc_exch_rrq(). The fc_exch_rrq needs to grab ex_lock lock again to schedule RRQ retry and in the meanwhile fc_exch_reset could occur before ex_lock is grabbed inside fc_exch_rrq. So to handle this case, this patch adds additional check to detect fc_exch_reset after ex_lock acquired and in case the fc_exch_reset occurred then abandons the RRQ retry and releases the exch. Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/scsi')
-rw-r--r--drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c23
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
index 2bc22be5f849..145ab9ba55ea 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
@@ -415,9 +415,9 @@ static void fc_exch_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
e_stat = ep->esb_stat;
if (e_stat & ESB_ST_COMPLETE) {
ep->esb_stat = e_stat & ~ESB_ST_REC_QUAL;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
if (e_stat & ESB_ST_REC_QUAL)
fc_exch_rrq(ep);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
goto done;
} else {
resp = ep->resp;
@@ -1624,14 +1624,14 @@ static void fc_exch_rrq(struct fc_exch *ep)
struct fc_lport *lp;
struct fc_els_rrq *rrq;
struct fc_frame *fp;
- struct fc_seq *rrq_sp;
u32 did;
lp = ep->lp;
fp = fc_frame_alloc(lp, sizeof(*rrq));
if (!fp)
- return;
+ goto retry;
+
rrq = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*rrq));
memset(rrq, 0, sizeof(*rrq));
rrq->rrq_cmd = ELS_RRQ;
@@ -1647,13 +1647,20 @@ static void fc_exch_rrq(struct fc_exch *ep)
fc_host_port_id(lp->host), FC_TYPE_ELS,
FC_FC_FIRST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ | FC_FC_SEQ_INIT, 0);
- rrq_sp = fc_exch_seq_send(lp, fp, fc_exch_rrq_resp, NULL, ep,
- lp->e_d_tov);
- if (!rrq_sp) {
- ep->esb_stat |= ESB_ST_REC_QUAL;
- fc_exch_timer_set_locked(ep, ep->r_a_tov);
+ if (fc_exch_seq_send(lp, fp, fc_exch_rrq_resp, NULL, ep, lp->e_d_tov))
+ return;
+
+retry:
+ spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
+ if (ep->state & (FC_EX_RST_CLEANUP | FC_EX_DONE)) {
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
+ /* drop hold for rec qual */
+ fc_exch_release(ep);
return;
}
+ ep->esb_stat |= ESB_ST_REC_QUAL;
+ fc_exch_timer_set_locked(ep, ep->r_a_tov);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
}