diff options
| author | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-08-15 00:05:54 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-08-17 00:45:07 +0200 |
| commit | fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded (patch) | |
| tree | 9006ce2d61e9cd8c9fa353e5cff61d5f6da09031 /drivers/net/ppp | |
| parent | 1bda52f80471260bcc7391f4e6919effedfc88d8 (diff) | |
| download | lwn-fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded.tar.gz lwn-fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded.zip | |
bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN into a function
Turn BPF_PROG_RUN into a proper always inlined function. No functional and
performance changes are intended, but it makes it much easier to understand
what's going on with how BPF programs are actually get executed. It's more
obvious what types and callbacks are expected. Also extra () around input
parameters can be dropped, as well as `__` variable prefixes intended to avoid
naming collisions, which makes the code simpler to read and write.
This refactoring also highlighted one extra issue. BPF_PROG_RUN is both
a macro and an enum value (BPF_PROG_RUN == BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN). Turning
BPF_PROG_RUN into a function causes naming conflict compilation error. So
rename BPF_PROG_RUN into lower-case bpf_prog_run(), similar to
bpf_prog_run_xdp(), bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(), etc. All existing callers of
BPF_PROG_RUN, the macro, are switched to bpf_prog_run() explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-2-andrii@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ppp')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c index e9e81573f21e..fb52cd175b45 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c +++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ ppp_send_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb) a four-byte PPP header on each packet */ *(u8 *)skb_push(skb, 2) = 1; if (ppp->pass_filter && - BPF_PROG_RUN(ppp->pass_filter, skb) == 0) { + bpf_prog_run(ppp->pass_filter, skb) == 0) { if (ppp->debug & 1) netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev, "PPP: outbound frame " @@ -1754,7 +1754,7 @@ ppp_send_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb) } /* if this packet passes the active filter, record the time */ if (!(ppp->active_filter && - BPF_PROG_RUN(ppp->active_filter, skb) == 0)) + bpf_prog_run(ppp->active_filter, skb) == 0)) ppp->last_xmit = jiffies; skb_pull(skb, 2); #else @@ -2468,7 +2468,7 @@ ppp_receive_nonmp_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb) *(u8 *)skb_push(skb, 2) = 0; if (ppp->pass_filter && - BPF_PROG_RUN(ppp->pass_filter, skb) == 0) { + bpf_prog_run(ppp->pass_filter, skb) == 0) { if (ppp->debug & 1) netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev, "PPP: inbound frame " @@ -2477,7 +2477,7 @@ ppp_receive_nonmp_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb) return; } if (!(ppp->active_filter && - BPF_PROG_RUN(ppp->active_filter, skb) == 0)) + bpf_prog_run(ppp->active_filter, skb) == 0)) ppp->last_recv = jiffies; __skb_pull(skb, 2); } else |