summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2010-12-23 09:48:41 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2010-12-23 09:48:41 +0100
commit26e20a108caca6231c6a5ec659f815a866904751 (patch)
tree36932c208a9e8994bfd7ed4eaf48b9c33f71fbe3 /drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
parent691513f70d3957939a318da970987b876c720861 (diff)
parent90a8a73c06cc32b609a880d48449d7083327e11a (diff)
downloadlwn-26e20a108caca6231c6a5ec659f815a866904751.tar.gz
lwn-26e20a108caca6231c6a5ec659f815a866904751.zip
Merge commit 'v2.6.37-rc7' into x86/security
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c17
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
index ed7757f14083..049f755567e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
@@ -354,6 +354,15 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
engine->graph.destroy_context = nv50_graph_destroy_context;
engine->graph.load_context = nv50_graph_load_context;
engine->graph.unload_context = nv50_graph_unload_context;
+ if (dev_priv->chipset != 0x86)
+ engine->graph.tlb_flush = nv50_graph_tlb_flush;
+ else {
+ /* from what i can see nvidia do this on every
+ * pre-NVA3 board except NVAC, but, we've only
+ * ever seen problems on NV86
+ */
+ engine->graph.tlb_flush = nv86_graph_tlb_flush;
+ }
engine->fifo.channels = 128;
engine->fifo.init = nv50_fifo_init;
engine->fifo.takedown = nv50_fifo_takedown;
@@ -365,6 +374,7 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
engine->fifo.destroy_context = nv50_fifo_destroy_context;
engine->fifo.load_context = nv50_fifo_load_context;
engine->fifo.unload_context = nv50_fifo_unload_context;
+ engine->fifo.tlb_flush = nv50_fifo_tlb_flush;
engine->display.early_init = nv50_display_early_init;
engine->display.late_takedown = nv50_display_late_takedown;
engine->display.create = nv50_display_create;
@@ -1041,6 +1051,9 @@ int nouveau_ioctl_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
case NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_PTIMER_TIME:
getparam->value = dev_priv->engine.timer.read(dev);
break;
+ case NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_BO_USAGE:
+ getparam->value = 1;
+ break;
case NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_GRAPH_UNITS:
/* NV40 and NV50 versions are quite different, but register
* address is the same. User is supposed to know the card
@@ -1051,7 +1064,7 @@ int nouveau_ioctl_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
}
/* FALLTHRU */
default:
- NV_ERROR(dev, "unknown parameter %lld\n", getparam->param);
+ NV_DEBUG(dev, "unknown parameter %lld\n", getparam->param);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1066,7 +1079,7 @@ nouveau_ioctl_setparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
switch (setparam->param) {
default:
- NV_ERROR(dev, "unknown parameter %lld\n", setparam->param);
+ NV_DEBUG(dev, "unknown parameter %lld\n", setparam->param);
return -EINVAL;
}