summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2013-01-14 13:23:03 +0000
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2013-02-02 00:01:14 +0100
commitb8eed8af94f9203e0cc39245ea335f4b8dc1ed31 (patch)
tree39c9e57baa6daf91295c331c6b995c9d6286b2bc /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
parentf85178048c083520bd920921744dd2c4a797fbc5 (diff)
downloadlwn-b8eed8af94f9203e0cc39245ea335f4b8dc1ed31.tar.gz
lwn-b8eed8af94f9203e0cc39245ea335f4b8dc1ed31.zip
cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()
__cpufreq_remove_dev() is called on multiple occasions: cpufreq_driver unregister and cpu removals. Current implementation of this routine is overly complex without much need. If the cpu to be removed is the policy->cpu, we remove the policy first and add all other cpus again from policy->cpus and then finally call __cpufreq_remove_dev() again to remove the cpu to be deleted. Haahhhh.. There exist a simple solution to removal of a cpu: - Simply use the old policy structure - update its fields like: policy->cpu, etc. - notify any users of cpufreq, which depend on changing policy->cpu Hence this patch, which tries to implement the above theory. It is tested well by myself on ARM big.LITTLE TC2 SoC, which has 5 cores (2 A15 and 3 A7). Both A15's share same struct policy and all A7's share same policy structure. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c27
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index 9d7732b81044..beef6b54382b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -170,11 +170,13 @@ static int freq_table_get_index(struct cpufreq_stats *stat, unsigned int freq)
static void cpufreq_stats_free_table(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu);
+
if (stat) {
+ pr_debug("%s: Free stat table\n", __func__);
kfree(stat->time_in_state);
kfree(stat);
+ per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu) = NULL;
}
- per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu) = NULL;
}
/* must be called early in the CPU removal sequence (before
@@ -183,8 +185,10 @@ static void cpufreq_stats_free_table(unsigned int cpu)
static void cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
- if (policy && policy->cpu == cpu)
+ if (policy && (cpumask_weight(policy->cpus) == 1)) {
+ pr_debug("%s: Free sysfs stat\n", __func__);
sysfs_remove_group(&policy->kobj, &stats_attr_group);
+ }
if (policy)
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
}
@@ -262,6 +266,19 @@ error_get_fail:
return ret;
}
+static void cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_stats *stat = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table,
+ policy->last_cpu);
+
+ pr_debug("Updating stats_table for new_cpu %u from last_cpu %u\n",
+ policy->cpu, policy->last_cpu);
+ per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->cpu) = per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table,
+ policy->last_cpu);
+ per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, policy->last_cpu) = NULL;
+ stat->cpu = policy->cpu;
+}
+
static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long val, void *data)
{
@@ -269,6 +286,12 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
+
+ if (val == CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU) {
+ cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu(policy);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (val != CPUFREQ_NOTIFY)
return 0;
table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpu);