ACPICA: struct acpi_nfit_interleave: Replace 1-element array with flexible array

ACPICA commit e66decc6fca36b59194b0947d87d6a9bec078bc3

Similar to "Replace one-element array with flexible-array", replace the
1-element array with a proper flexible array member as defined by C99.

This allows the code to operate without tripping compile-time and run-
time bounds checkers (e.g. via __builtin_object_size(), -fsanitize=bounds,
and/or -fstrict-flex-arrays=3).

Unlike struct acpi_nfit_flush_address and struct acpi_nfit_smbios, which
had their sizeof() uses adjusted in code, struct acpi_nfit_interleave did
not. This appears to have been a bug. After this change, there is a binary
difference in acpi_dm_dump_nfit() since the size of the structure now has
the correct size, as the prior result was including the trailing U32:

-       mov    $0x14,%ebp
+       mov    $0x10,%ebp

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/e66decc6
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index 85d9d67e38a4..07204d482968 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -3476,7 +3476,7 @@ static __init int nfit_init(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit) != 40);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_system_address) != 64);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) != 48);
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_interleave) != 20);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_interleave) != 16);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_smbios) != 8);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) != 80);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region) != 40);