summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLi Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>2013-09-09 14:05:40 +0800
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2013-09-12 19:14:17 +0200
commit3b524d60943a2f9ee1194323ff9d5ee01a4d1ce1 (patch)
tree542dd1c5f0ec27c572060aee449903d57cb9d5e9 /Documentation
parentfc840914e9b07ab4685c195e1e54e58de4f84c03 (diff)
downloadlwn-3b524d60943a2f9ee1194323ff9d5ee01a4d1ce1.tar.gz
lwn-3b524d60943a2f9ee1194323ff9d5ee01a4d1ce1.zip
sched/Documentation: Update sched-design-CFS.txt documentation
2bd2d6f2dc ("sched: Replace use of entity_key()") had remove the entity_key() which function is to subtract a tasks vruntime by its groups minvruntime as the rbtree key. The phrase "there is a subtraction using rq->cfs.min_vruntime to account for possible wraparounds" in documentation feels strange and meaningless. So remove it. Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378706740-7500-1-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt4
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt
index d529e02d928d..f14f49304222 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt
@@ -66,9 +66,7 @@ rq->cfs.load value, which is the sum of the weights of the tasks queued on the
runqueue.
CFS maintains a time-ordered rbtree, where all runnable tasks are sorted by the
-p->se.vruntime key (there is a subtraction using rq->cfs.min_vruntime to
-account for possible wraparounds). CFS picks the "leftmost" task from this
-tree and sticks to it.
+p->se.vruntime key. CFS picks the "leftmost" task from this tree and sticks to it.
As the system progresses forwards, the executed tasks are put into the tree
more and more to the right --- slowly but surely giving a chance for every task
to become the "leftmost task" and thus get on the CPU within a deterministic