summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/locking
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>2018-02-09 17:01:14 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2018-02-11 12:28:58 +0100
commit79e902382637a2f421b7f295dcf9934d80d84d7d (patch)
tree26dc897085891ade35aa25219318c73ddf3c58f6 /Documentation/locking
parentf1517df8701c9f12dae9ce7f43a5d300a6917619 (diff)
downloadlwn-79e902382637a2f421b7f295dcf9934d80d84d7d.tar.gz
lwn-79e902382637a2f421b7f295dcf9934d80d84d7d.zip
Documentation/locking/mutex-design: Update to reflect latest changes
Commit 3ca0ff571b09 ("locking/mutex: Rework mutex::owner") reworked the basic mutex implementation to deal with several problems. Documentation was however left unchanged and became stale. Update mutex-design.txt to reflect changes introduced by the above commit. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180209160114.19980-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com [ Small readability tweaks to the text. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/locking')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/locking/mutex-design.txt49
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/locking/mutex-design.txt b/Documentation/locking/mutex-design.txt
index 60c482df1a38..818aca19612f 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/mutex-design.txt
+++ b/Documentation/locking/mutex-design.txt
@@ -21,37 +21,23 @@ Implementation
--------------
Mutexes are represented by 'struct mutex', defined in include/linux/mutex.h
-and implemented in kernel/locking/mutex.c. These locks use a three
-state atomic counter (->count) to represent the different possible
-transitions that can occur during the lifetime of a lock:
-
- 1: unlocked
- 0: locked, no waiters
- negative: locked, with potential waiters
-
-In its most basic form it also includes a wait-queue and a spinlock
-that serializes access to it. CONFIG_SMP systems can also include
-a pointer to the lock task owner (->owner) as well as a spinner MCS
-lock (->osq), both described below in (ii).
+and implemented in kernel/locking/mutex.c. These locks use an atomic variable
+(->owner) to keep track of the lock state during its lifetime. Field owner
+actually contains 'struct task_struct *' to the current lock owner and it is
+therefore NULL if not currently owned. Since task_struct pointers are aligned
+at at least L1_CACHE_BYTES, low bits (3) are used to store extra state (e.g.,
+if waiter list is non-empty). In its most basic form it also includes a
+wait-queue and a spinlock that serializes access to it. Furthermore,
+CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER=y systems use a spinner MCS lock (->osq), described
+below in (ii).
When acquiring a mutex, there are three possible paths that can be
taken, depending on the state of the lock:
-(i) fastpath: tries to atomically acquire the lock by decrementing the
- counter. If it was already taken by another task it goes to the next
- possible path. This logic is architecture specific. On x86-64, the
- locking fastpath is 2 instructions:
-
- 0000000000000e10 <mutex_lock>:
- e21: f0 ff 0b lock decl (%rbx)
- e24: 79 08 jns e2e <mutex_lock+0x1e>
-
- the unlocking fastpath is equally tight:
-
- 0000000000000bc0 <mutex_unlock>:
- bc8: f0 ff 07 lock incl (%rdi)
- bcb: 7f 0a jg bd7 <mutex_unlock+0x17>
-
+(i) fastpath: tries to atomically acquire the lock by cmpxchg()ing the owner with
+ the current task. This only works in the uncontended case (cmpxchg() checks
+ against 0UL, so all 3 state bits above have to be 0). If the lock is
+ contended it goes to the next possible path.
(ii) midpath: aka optimistic spinning, tries to spin for acquisition
while the lock owner is running and there are no other tasks ready
@@ -143,11 +129,10 @@ Test if the mutex is taken:
Disadvantages
-------------
-Unlike its original design and purpose, 'struct mutex' is larger than
-most locks in the kernel. E.g: on x86-64 it is 40 bytes, almost twice
-as large as 'struct semaphore' (24 bytes) and tied, along with rwsems,
-for the largest lock in the kernel. Larger structure sizes mean more
-CPU cache and memory footprint.
+Unlike its original design and purpose, 'struct mutex' is among the largest
+locks in the kernel. E.g: on x86-64 it is 32 bytes, where 'struct semaphore'
+is 24 bytes and rw_semaphore is 40 bytes. Larger structure sizes mean more CPU
+cache and memory footprint.
When to use mutexes
-------------------