diff options
author | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> | 2020-07-21 15:59:19 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> | 2020-07-21 16:02:13 -0700 |
commit | ab673b987488c4fab7a0bc4824a48211f9d910e3 (patch) | |
tree | 16ec1d6324aa8c0fe60f3d5f45f35b65de43f2ae /Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst | |
parent | 777afe4e68d7ac37711d36098bea65650ec305a0 (diff) | |
download | lwn-ab673b987488c4fab7a0bc4824a48211f9d910e3.tar.gz lwn-ab673b987488c4fab7a0bc4824a48211f9d910e3.zip |
fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->i_crypt_info
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.
fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are
allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto. So by
using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal
implementation details of these other kernel subsystems.
Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.
(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)
Fixes: e37a784d8b6a ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions