From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- include/linux/timekeeping.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/timekeeping.h') diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h index 361f8bf1429d..d2e804e15c3e 100644 --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ extern void ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64(struct timespec64 *ts_raw, * @cs_was_changed_seq: The sequence number of clocksource change events */ struct system_time_snapshot { - cycle_t cycles; + u64 cycles; ktime_t real; ktime_t raw; unsigned int clock_was_set_seq; @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ struct system_device_crosststamp { * timekeeping code to verify comparibility of two cycle values */ struct system_counterval_t { - cycle_t cycles; + u64 cycles; struct clocksource *cs; }; -- cgit v1.2.3