From 92d96b603738ec4f35cde7198c303ae264dd47cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Bakker Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 18:01:54 -0700 Subject: regulator: wm8994: Add an off-on delay for WM8994 variant As per Table 130 of the wm8994 datasheet at [1], there is an off-on delay for LDO1 and LDO2. In the wm8958 datasheet [2], I could not find any reference to it. I could not find a wm1811 datasheet to double-check there, but as no one has complained presumably it works without it. This solves the issue on Samsung Aries boards with a wm8994 where register writes fail when the device is powered off and back-on quickly. [1] https://statics.cirrus.com/pubs/proDatasheet/WM8994_Rev4.6.pdf [2] https://statics.cirrus.com/pubs/proDatasheet/WM8958_v3.5.pdf Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker Acked-by: Charles Keepax Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CY4PR04MB056771CFB80DC447C30D5A31CB1D9@CY4PR04MB0567.namprd04.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/regulator') diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c index cadea0344486..40befdd9dfa9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c @@ -71,6 +71,35 @@ static const struct regulator_ops wm8994_ldo2_ops = { }; static const struct regulator_desc wm8994_ldo_desc[] = { + { + .name = "LDO1", + .id = 1, + .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, + .n_voltages = WM8994_LDO1_MAX_SELECTOR + 1, + .vsel_reg = WM8994_LDO_1, + .vsel_mask = WM8994_LDO1_VSEL_MASK, + .ops = &wm8994_ldo1_ops, + .min_uV = 2400000, + .uV_step = 100000, + .enable_time = 3000, + .off_on_delay = 36000, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + }, + { + .name = "LDO2", + .id = 2, + .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, + .n_voltages = WM8994_LDO2_MAX_SELECTOR + 1, + .vsel_reg = WM8994_LDO_2, + .vsel_mask = WM8994_LDO2_VSEL_MASK, + .ops = &wm8994_ldo2_ops, + .enable_time = 3000, + .off_on_delay = 36000, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + }, +}; + +static const struct regulator_desc wm8958_ldo_desc[] = { { .name = "LDO1", .id = 1, @@ -172,9 +201,16 @@ static int wm8994_ldo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * regulator core and we need not worry about it on the * error path. */ - ldo->regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, - &wm8994_ldo_desc[id], - &config); + if (ldo->wm8994->type == WM8994) { + ldo->regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, + &wm8994_ldo_desc[id], + &config); + } else { + ldo->regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, + &wm8958_ldo_desc[id], + &config); + } + if (IS_ERR(ldo->regulator)) { ret = PTR_ERR(ldo->regulator); dev_err(wm8994->dev, "Failed to register LDO%d: %d\n", -- cgit v1.2.3 From 17049bf9de55a42ee96fd34520aff8a484677675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:25:14 +0800 Subject: regulator: rtq2134: Fix missing active_discharge_on setting The active_discharge_on setting was missed, so output discharge resistor is always disabled. Fix it. Fixes: 0555d41497de ("regulator: rtq2134: Add support for Richtek RTQ2134 SubPMIC") Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404022514.449231-1-axel.lin@ingics.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/rtq2134-regulator.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'drivers/regulator') diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rtq2134-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rtq2134-regulator.c index f21e3f8b21f2..8e13dea354a2 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/rtq2134-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/rtq2134-regulator.c @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ static const unsigned int rtq2134_buck_ramp_delay_table[] = { .enable_mask = RTQ2134_VOUTEN_MASK, \ .active_discharge_reg = RTQ2134_REG_BUCK##_id##_CFG0, \ .active_discharge_mask = RTQ2134_ACTDISCHG_MASK, \ + .active_discharge_on = RTQ2134_ACTDISCHG_MASK, \ .ramp_reg = RTQ2134_REG_BUCK##_id##_RSPCFG, \ .ramp_mask = RTQ2134_RSPUP_MASK, \ .ramp_delay_table = rtq2134_buck_ramp_delay_table, \ -- cgit v1.2.3 From 2316f0fc0ad2aa87a568ceaf3d76be983ee555c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 21:22:35 +0800 Subject: regulator: atc260x: Fix missing active_discharge_on setting Without active_discharge_on setting, the SWITCH1 discharge enable control is always disabled. Fix it. Fixes: 3b15ccac161a ("regulator: Add regulator driver for ATC260x PMICs") Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220403132235.123727-1-axel.lin@ingics.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/atc260x-regulator.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'drivers/regulator') diff --git a/drivers/regulator/atc260x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/atc260x-regulator.c index 05147d2c3842..485e58b264c0 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/atc260x-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/atc260x-regulator.c @@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ enum atc2603c_reg_ids { .bypass_mask = BIT(5), \ .active_discharge_reg = ATC2603C_PMU_SWITCH_CTL, \ .active_discharge_mask = BIT(1), \ + .active_discharge_on = BIT(1), \ .owner = THIS_MODULE, \ } -- cgit v1.2.3