From 3543f8830babe2666051fb239545f51e0aae4c84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 01:11:53 +0300 Subject: x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall() Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success. Fix the comment. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com --- arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/coco') diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S index f9eb1134f22d..74b108e94a0d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall) tdcall /* - * RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that + * RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that * something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module. * * The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate -- cgit v1.2.3