From fc371c057452f734868ad2b2738cc715fad74d87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:00:45 -0400
Subject: ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly

commit 2f974865ffdfe7b9f46a9940836c8b167342563d upstream.

The following commit introduced a bug when checking for zero length extent

5946d08 ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()

Zero length extent could pass the check if lblock is zero.

Adding the explicit check for zero length back.

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 96a1ce159f51..4e237a6b4b33 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ext)
 	ext4_lblk_t lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block);
 	ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1;
 
-	if (lblock > last)
+	if (len == 0 || lblock > last)
 		return 0;
 	return ext4_data_block_valid(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), block, len);
 }
-- 
cgit v1.2.3