From f7d5463e2a8f1fef855af2b62a1f7b59b830ad05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Uwe Kleine-König Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 10:44:15 +0200 Subject: pwm: cros-ec: Don't care about consumers in .get_state() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The get_state() callback is never called (in a visible way) after there is a consumer for a pwm device. The core handles loosing the information about duty_cycle just fine. Simplify the driver accordingly. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240607084416.897777-6-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com [Drop kdoc comment for channel to make W=1 builds happy] Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c | 34 +--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c index 606ccfdaf4cc..ea0dd553a626 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c @@ -20,20 +20,10 @@ * * @ec: Pointer to EC device * @use_pwm_type: Use PWM types instead of generic channels - * @channel: array with per-channel data */ struct cros_ec_pwm_device { struct cros_ec_device *ec; bool use_pwm_type; - struct cros_ec_pwm *channel; -}; - -/** - * struct cros_ec_pwm - per-PWM driver data - * @duty_cycle: cached duty cycle - */ -struct cros_ec_pwm { - u16 duty_cycle; }; static inline struct cros_ec_pwm_device *pwm_to_cros_ec_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip) @@ -135,7 +125,6 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state) { struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm = pwm_to_cros_ec_pwm(chip); - struct cros_ec_pwm *channel = &ec_pwm->channel[pwm->hwpwm]; u16 duty_cycle; int ret; @@ -156,8 +145,6 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, if (ret < 0) return ret; - channel->duty_cycle = state->duty_cycle; - return 0; } @@ -165,7 +152,6 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state) { struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm = pwm_to_cros_ec_pwm(chip); - struct cros_ec_pwm *channel = &ec_pwm->channel[pwm->hwpwm]; int ret; ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec_pwm->ec, ec_pwm->use_pwm_type, pwm->hwpwm); @@ -175,23 +161,10 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, } state->enabled = (ret > 0); + state->duty_cycle = ret; state->period = EC_PWM_MAX_DUTY; state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL; - /* - * Note that "disabled" and "duty cycle == 0" are treated the same. If - * the cached duty cycle is not zero, used the cached duty cycle. This - * ensures that the configured duty cycle is kept across a disable and - * enable operation and avoids potentially confusing consumers. - * - * For the case of the initial hardware readout, channel->duty_cycle - * will be 0 and the actual duty cycle read from the EC is used. - */ - if (ret == 0 && channel->duty_cycle > 0) - state->duty_cycle = channel->duty_cycle; - else - state->duty_cycle = ret; - return 0; } @@ -291,11 +264,6 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) chip->ops = &cros_ec_pwm_ops; chip->of_xlate = cros_ec_pwm_xlate; - ec_pwm->channel = devm_kcalloc(dev, chip->npwm, sizeof(*ec_pwm->channel), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!ec_pwm->channel) - return -ENOMEM; - dev_dbg(dev, "Probed %u PWMs\n", chip->npwm); ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip); -- cgit v1.2.3