lwn.git/include/asm-i386/e820.h, branch docs-next

i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86

2007-10-11T09:20:03+00:00

Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION

2007-07-29T23:45:38+00:00

Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION to avoid confusion (among other things, with CONFIG_SUSPEND introduced in the next patch). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

i386: do not restore reserved memory after hibernation

2007-07-22T01:37:12+00:00

On some systems the ACPI NVS area is located in the first 1 MB of RAM and it is overwritten by the i386 code during the restore after hibernation. This confuses the ACPI platform firmware that doesn't update the AC adapter status appropriately as a result (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7995). The solution is to register the reserved memory in the first 1 MB as 'nosave', so that swsusp doesn't touch it during the restore. Also, this has been done on x86_64 for a long time now, so this patch makes the i386 restore code behave like the x86_64 one. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Pavel Machek Cc: David Rientjes Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Make definitions for struct e820entry and struct e820map consistent

2007-07-12T17:55:54+00:00

Make definitions for struct e820entry and struct e820map consistent between i386 and x86-64. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] x86: fix amd64-agp aperture validation

2007-05-02T17:27:11+00:00

Under CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM, assuming that a !pfn_valid() implies all subsequent pfn-s are also invalid is wrong. Thus replace this by explicitly checking against the E820 map. AK: make e820 on x86-64 not initdata Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Acked-by: Mark Langsdorf

[PATCH] compile error of register_memory()

2006-12-22T16:55:49+00:00

register_memory() becomes double definition in 2.6.20-rc1. It is defined in arch/i386/kernel/setup.c as static definition in 2.6.19. But it is moved to arch/i386/kernel/e820.c in 2.6.20-rc1. And same name function is defined in driver/base/memory.c too. So, it becomes cause of compile error of duplicate definition if memory hotplug option is on. Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto Cc: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] i386: Move memory map printing and other code to e820.c

2006-12-07T01:14:06+00:00

This patch moves e820 memory map print and memmap boot param parsing function from setup.c to e820.c, also adds limit_regions and print_memory_map declaration in header file. Signed-off-by: bibo,mao Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 158 --------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 153 ----------------------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)

[PATCH] i386: Move e820/efi memmap walking code to e820.c

2006-12-07T01:14:06+00:00

This patch moves e820/efi memmap table walking function from setup.c to e820.c, also this patch adds extern declaration in header file. Signed-off-by: bibo,mao Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 118 ----------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 arch/i386/kernel/e820.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 118 ----------------------------------------------- include/asm-i386/e820.h | 2 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)

[PATCH] i386: Move find_max_pfn function to e820.c

2006-12-07T01:14:06+00:00

Move more code from setup.c into e820.c Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen

[PATCH] x86: Remove incorrect comment about ACPI e820 entries

2006-09-26T08:52:38+00:00

They cannot be actually freed because the FACS table has a shared-with-the-BIOS lock. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen