lwn.git/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h, branch docs-4.16

Merge branch 'acpi-ec' into acpi

2017-11-30T12:37:29+00:00

* acpi-ec: ACPI / EC: Fix regression related to PM ops support in ECDT device

ACPI / EC: Fix regression related to PM ops support in ECDT device

2017-11-20T23:13:02+00:00

On platforms (ASUS X550ZE and possibly all ASUS X series) with valid ECDT EC but invalid DSDT EC, EC PM ops won't be invoked as ECDT EC is not an ACPI device. Thus the following commit actually removed post-resume acpi_ec_enable_event() invocation for such platforms, and triggered a regression on them that after being resumed, EC (actually should be ECDT) driver stops handling EC events: Commit: c2b46d679b30c5c0d7eb47a21085943242bdd8dc Subject: ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process Notice that the root cause actually is "ECDT is not an ACPI device" rather than "the timing of acpi_ec_enable_event() invocation", this patch fixes this issue by enumerating ECDT EC as an ACPI device. Due to the existence of the noirq stage, the ability of tuning the timing of acpi_ec_enable_event() invocation is still meaningful. This patch is a little bit different from the posted fix by moving acpi_config_boot_ec() from acpi_ec_ecdt_start() to acpi_ec_add() to make sure that EC event handling won't be stopped as long as the ACPI EC driver is bound. Thus the following sequence shouldn't disable EC event handling: unbind,suspend,resume,bind. Fixes: c2b46d679b30 (ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process) Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 Reported-by: Luya Tshimbalanga Tested-by: Luya Tshimbalanga Cc: 4.9+ # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / scan: Fix enumeration for special UART devices

2017-10-20T12:24:44+00:00

UART devices is expected to be enumerated by SerDev subsystem. During ACPI scan, serial devices behind SPI, I2C or UART buses are not enumerated, allowing them to be enumerated by their respective parents. Rename *spi_i2c_slave* to *serial_bus_slave* as this will be used for serial devices on serial buses (SPI, I2C or UART). On Macs an empty ResourceTemplate is returned for uart slaves. Instead the device properties "baud", "parity", "dataBits", "stopBits" are provided. Add a check for "baud" in acpi_is_serial_bus_slave(). Signed-off-by: Frédéric Danis Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel Tested-by: Ronald Tschalär Tested-by: Peter Y. Chuang Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / bus: Make ACPI_HANDLE() work for non-GPL code again

2017-09-19T20:42:31+00:00

Due to commit db3e50f3234b (device property: Get rid of struct fwnode_handle type field), ACPI_HANDLE() inadvertently became a GPL-only call. The call path that led to that was: ACPI_HANDLE() ACPI_COMPANION() to_acpi_device_node() is_acpi_device_node() acpi_device_fwnode_ops DECLARE_ACPI_FWNODE_OPS(acpi_device_fwnode_ops); ...and the new DECLARE_ACPI_FWNODE_OPS() includes EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, whereas previously it was a static struct. In order to avoid changing any of that, let's instead provide ever so slightly better encapsulation of those struct fwnode_operations instances. Those do not really need to be directly used in inline function calls in header files. Simply moving two small functions (is_acpi_device_node and is_acpi_data_node) out of acpi_bus.h, and into a .c file, does that. That leaves the internals of struct fwnode_operations as GPL-only (which I think was the intent all along), but un-breaks any driver code out there that relies on the ACPI subsystem's being (historically) an EXPORT_SYMBOL-usable system. By that, I mean, ACPI_HANDLE() and other basic ACPI calls were non-GPL-protected. Also, while I'm there, remove a tiny bit of redundancy that was missed in the earlier commit, by having is_acpi_node() use the other two routines, instead of checking fwnode directly. Fixes: db3e50f3234b (device property: Get rid of struct fwnode_handle type field) Signed-off-by: John Hubbard Acked-by: Sakari Ailus Acked-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Merge tag 'devprop-4.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm

2017-09-05T19:50:00+00:00

Pull device properties framework updates from Rafael Wysocki: "These introduce fwnode operations for all of the separate types of 'firmware nodes' that can be handled by the device properties framework, make the framework use const fwnode arguments all over, add a helper for the consolidated handling of node references and switch over the framework to the new UUID API. Specifics: - Introduce fwnode operations for all of the separate types of 'firmware nodes' that can be handled by the device properties framework and drop the type field from struct fwnode_handle (Sakari Ailus, Arnd Bergmann). - Make the device properties framework use const fwnode arguments where possible (Sakari Ailus). - Add a helper for the consolidated handling of node references to the device properties framework (Sakari Ailus). - Switch over the ACPI part of the device properties framework to the new UUID API (Andy Shevchenko)" * tag 'devprop-4.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: ACPI: device property: Switch to use new generic UUID API device property: export irqchip_fwnode_ops device property: Introduce fwnode_property_get_reference_args device property: Constify fwnode property API device property: Constify argument to pset fwnode backend ACPI: Constify internal fwnode arguments ACPI: Constify acpi_bus helper functions, switch to macros ACPI: Prepare for constifying acpi_get_next_subnode() fwnode argument device property: Get rid of struct fwnode_handle type field ACPI: Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() instead of non-NULL check in is_acpi_data_node()

Merge branches 'acpi-ec', 'acpi-dma', 'acpi-processor' and 'acpi-cppc'

2017-09-03T21:53:39+00:00

* acpi-ec: ACPI / EC: Clean up EC GPE mask flag ACPI: EC: Fix possible issues related to EC initialization order * acpi-dma: ACPI/IORT: Add IORT named component memory address limits ACPI: Make acpi_dma_configure() DMA regions aware ACPI: Introduce DMA ranges parsing ACPI: Make acpi_dev_get_resources() method agnostic * acpi-processor: ACPI / processor: make function acpi_processor_check_duplicates() static ACPI: processor: use dev_dbg() instead of dev_warn() when CPPC probe failed * acpi-cppc: mailbox: pcc: Drop uninformative output during boot

ACPI: Introduce DMA ranges parsing

2017-08-07T12:28:51+00:00

Some devices have limited addressing capabilities and cannot reference the whole memory address space while carrying out DMA operations (eg some devices with bus address bits range smaller than system bus - which prevents them from using bus addresses that are otherwise valid for the system). The ACPI _DMA object allows bus devices to define the DMA window that is actually addressable by devices that sit upstream the bus, therefore providing a means to parse and initialize the devices DMA masks and addressable DMA range size. By relying on the generic ACPI kernel layer to retrieve and parse resources, introduce ACPI core code to parse the _DMA object. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi Tested-by: Nate Watterson Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / PCI / PM: Rework acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup()

2017-08-01T12:05:03+00:00

The acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() routine is there to handle cases in which PCI bridges (or PCIe ports) are expected to signal wakeup for devices below them, but currently it doesn't do that correctly. The problem is that acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() uses acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for bridges and if that routine is called for multiple times to disable wakeup for the same device, it will disable it on the first invocation and the next calls will have no effect (it works analogously when called to enable wakeup, but that is not a problem). Now, say acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() has been called for two different devices under the same bridge and it has called acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for that bridge each time. The bridge is now enabled to generate wakeup signals. Next, suppose that one of the devices below it resumes and acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() is called to disable wakeup for that device. It will then call acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for the bridge and that will effectively disable remote wakeup for all devices under it even though some of them may still be suspended and remote wakeup may be expected to work for them. To address this (arguably theoretical) issue, allow wakeup.enable_count under struct acpi_device to grow beyond 1 in certain situations. In particular, allow that to happen in acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() when wakeup is enabled or disabled for PCI bridges, so that wakeup is actually disabled for the bridge when all devices under it resume and not when just one of them does that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas

ACPI / PM: Split acpi_device_wakeup()

2017-08-01T12:05:03+00:00

To prepare for a subsequent change and make the code somewhat easier to follow, do the following in the ACPI device wakeup handling code: * Replace wakeup.flags.enabled under struct acpi_device with wakeup.enable_count as that will be necessary going forward. For now, wakeup.enable_count is not allowed to grow beyond 1, so the current behavior is retained. * Split acpi_device_wakeup() into acpi_device_wakeup_enable() and acpi_device_wakeup_disable() and modify the callers of it accordingly. * Introduce a new acpi_wakeup_lock mutex to protect the wakeup enabling/disabling code from races in case it is executed more than once in parallel for the same device (which may happen for bridges theoretically). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg

ACPI: Constify acpi_bus helper functions, switch to macros

2017-07-21T22:04:50+00:00

Constify arguments to is_acpi_node(), is_acpi_device_node(), is_acpi_static_node() and acpi_data_node_match(). Make to_acpi_device_node() and to_acpi_data_node() macros that can cope with const and non-const arguments. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki